93. Mysticism. part one
I feel that I should tell what I have so for learnt about
mysticism, in the final blog of this book, after travelling on this toad for
thirteen and a half years. It has to be an interim report, subject to revision.
I have not crossed any important landmark, as outlined by other accomplished
seekers, and I have not travelled long enough. Great Qalander told my brother
that he came in that area fifty-fifty-five years ago. But still I have made
some gains, which entitles me to say something. I will write more about my struggle
in Foreword. Here I want to talk not about myself but about the subject matter.
I have arrived at some conclusions;
1. Nobody travels
on the road to God-realization (or spirituality, or mysticism, or Sufism or tareekat, or real Yoga for God-union)
without God’s prior approval. In other words everybody is pre-selected. In blog
8, my categorization was wrong. Still there are 2 groups, so the grouping in
blog 8 is correct. But the grouping should be based on age; those who are pious
in youth and even childhood, and those who come later in life.
Jesus Christ said “many
are called, few are chosen”
Who is called? Those who have a receiver in their soul. Just
as a radio or a television set has a receiver which catches the waves in the
atmosphere, some people have a receiver but vast majority does not.
The call comes many times in such person’s life, but it
bears fruit only when the soul is ready, otherwise, person just ignores it...
It may bear fruit in childhood, or in middle age or even in old age. Therefore
the classification should be:
1) People
with very powerful receiver. Born yogis and fakirs, such as almost all the
mystics that I have written in my two books with the possible exception of Mr.
Shevani.
2) People
with ordinary receiver. These people often turn to this path in their fifties
or there about, when passions cool off.
3) People
with no receiver. Rest of humanity
I have written in great detail about this early process, and
subsequent stages in blog, 8, 25, 33-38, therefore there is no need of
repeating it.
2. Those who are
content with their life will not go on this path. This includes the ordinary
religious, devoutly religious, secular humanist, and ordinary worldly people.
Only people who are discontent and unhappy with their inner life turn to
mysticism. Those who have hunger in their soul, restlessness in their heart,
void in their beings, look and search for something more.
Take the example of devoutly religious. One may think that
since they follow religious tenets so much they would have great love for God,
and thus more prone to mysticism, sine mysticism aims at closeness to God.
Religious tenets are nothing but duties to God and fellow human beings
You will be farthest from truth. Often the devoutly
religious are so extreme in their views and so narrow minded that it borders
upon fanaticism. First they are completely sure that their religion is the
best, so what is the need to go to second best. Secondly, they are completely
certain that the instructions given in their religion are comprehensive, why to
add something more such as meditation, which is anyway a Hindu concept.
Thirdly, they have heard that the practice of mysticism requires isolation from
society, chastity, etc, which are often forbidden not only in their religion,
but are against common sense. If every body starts sitting isolated in caves
and houses, how can the society function? Who will earn the living? How will
procreation proceed ?
As for
others, they don’t particularly care about God. As my two friends ( one
religious and the other atheist ) remarked “ I am not particularly keen to meet
God any earlier than I have to” and the religious one added “ I don’t want to
think of Him now, I will be with Him, after death, for whole of eternity”
3. What is the
purpose of mysticism? In the opinion of
this mote there are several purposes:
A). To
prove that there is a God. Read blog 92 again, Paul Brunton who initially was a
disbeliever became a believer. People who watch these mystics closely, get
convinced that there is God. They sometimes see supernatural events from them.
Furthermore, these sages never tell a lie, therefore if these sages say that
there is God, and they have personally seen or felt God, then there must be
God. Sri Ramakrishna used to tell a story of a little boy who had never seen
his father, but loved him dearly. When asked why does he love his father when
he had never even seen him. The little boy replied “ but my mother has seen him
“
b) To have direct access to God or His
representatives, for those who want it. The fire of God brought originally by
prophets becomes dim after passage of time. Rituals replace the message.
Adaptability, a requirement for any system to remain efficient over time (
telephone, radio, cars, airplanes, etc; to name a few ) is prohibited.
This system allows direct access to the Source, the God.
These sages bring the fire again and again to humanity, though not on such a
large scale as prophets.
Great Qalander said as much to my brother “ such people are
present in all religions, in all areas, and in all times”
These mystics do not bring any new knowledge. They do not
bring new guidelines or formulas. There message is the same: Be good to others,
love God with all your power, conquer your desires, know your Self
c) These mystics spread the message, they have
personally learnt, by daily talk to the visitors, through books, through
disciples
d) They
have a healing power emanating from their body, which spreads peace and
tranquility around them ( Brunton noted it from Maharishee ). In old times,
when medicines were not readily available, these sages taught spiritual
practices for common maladies such as headache, backache, scorpion bite, snake
bite, etc.
e) The
great adepts have all proclaimed, that once one has realized Self, it becomes
an infallible guide to one’s problems. When Brother Lawrence was entrusted to
buy wine for the monastery, he was not fearful at all. He told God (Self ) “it
is Your problem”
To be continued
No comments:
Post a Comment